John C. Wright ([info]johncwright) wrote,

Now is the time to put faction aside

I hate to say it, but I was fooled by an immoderate anti-Clinton press during Clinton's term, much as the BDS Left was fooled by an immoderate anti-Bush press during Bush's term. Let cooler heads prevail.

We must pause in admiration that this is an historic moment. The first Black man has been elected President of this nation. Complaints that the United States suffers from institutional racism from this moment on must be met with hoots of contempt. Would that it had been Alan Keyes or Colin Powell instead, but the significance of the moment is undiminished by the smallness of the man who plays this epochal role. Let the goats and bulls and stoats in Kenya gush forth the sacrificial blood beneath the knives of celebration!

In four years, we shall see another historical first, as Sarah Palin becomes the first lady President, and her husband become First Dude. Perhaps by that time, the conservatives will have jettisoned the idea of big-government conservatism, and return to the ideals of Goldwater, Reagan, and Burke. Maybe we can take the time to reread the Federalist Papers and re-acquaint ourselves with what are alleged to be our first principles, or perhaps even Adam Smith.

The ire of the Left following a Palin inauguration will be as great a temptation to them, then, as ire is to the Right, now, on the eve of an Obama inauguration. Let us by all means eschew such temptation. Let there be no four years of Obama Derangement Syndrome, please.

The Founding Fathers hated faction and the spirit of faction, and this republic cannot stand if we cannot pack away the language and passions of faction, once the election is over, in the same way we pack up the bunting and the bandwagon banners.

Let us reflect on the duties enjoined upon a free man under a republican form of government in these times; and next on the duties of a philosopher; and finally on the duties of a Christian.

First, our duty as citizens of a democratic republic is to affirm our loyalty to the will of the majority. The losers form rank and file behind the winners in a democracy. Everyone had a chance to vote; but the bargain is that you agree to abide by the outcome, and that agreement is implicit in the act of voting. That is the price you pay for democracy, my fellow sovereign citizens. Anything less erodes the sovereignty of the people. We are at war, and we have a new Commander-in-Chief. During wartime is not the time to diminish the authority of the leadership. It is better, for the sake of obedience and cohesion, to obey a bad leader than to follow the fractures of party faction.

Second, the duty of a philosopher is to regard adversity with Olympian detachment, if not stoicism, and to offer that obedience to the laws that logic and right reason commands. Socrates drank hemlock rather than disobey the laws placed above him, and died with the dignity of a philosopher, the courage of a soldier. Do you wish to live a life free from the misery folly brings? Then you must study philosophy and temper your passions. Can no modern man follow the ancient models? Are we to be found wanting in such virtue, when the yoke of the laws under which we labor are so much lighter than this?

Third, the duty of Christian men is to obey the authorities placed above us. "Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation" (Romans 13:2).

My brothers in Christ, do we take these words of Holy Scripture seriously? As far as I know, there was no revised version of the Bible printed up during the Enlightenment that left out the inconvenient passage after the fashion of Luther scuttling the inconvenient the Book of the Maccabees. This verse was written in a century which also saw Imperial Rome persecuting Christians in the bloodiest fashion the ancient world knew--the faithful being torn to pieces by wild beasts as a popular entertainment, or tied to stakes covered in pitch and ignited as screaming torches for the amusement of the Emperor's court. Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's was the command of Our Lord, who submitted to a kangaroo court, and who was handed to the tormentors appease popular tumult. Obama is not the Messiah, but neither is he Nero.

Even the Founders of the United States did not sever the bands tying them to the British Crown until a long train of abuses and usurpations made clear the English King's design was to reduce the colonies to servitude. The Founders took up arms only once every lawful avenue of reconciliation was exhausted. Socialized medicine will be bad, and an era of weakened military, international folly, stagflation and intimidation of political opposition will be bad. The Carthaginian levels of infant sacrifice on the altar of aborticide will be bad, and that innocent blood will cry out to heaven for vengeance: but such wretchedness and wickedness do not rise to the level that allows Christian men to take up arms against their own sovereign, or even to speak sedition. In this case, I remind you again, ye Christians, that our sovereign in this nation is the body of our neighbors, those same neighbors whom we are commanded to love as ourselves.

The loyal opposition must be loyal. We can counsel our neighbors and petition our leadership in the course we think wise. We can pray that the Lord in His mercy spare us from the corrective rod of the Assyrian, or, in this case, the Kenyan, He has seen fit to bring across our stiff necks. We can oppose only to the degree that the natural rights guaranteed by what used to be the Bill of Rights allows: the First Amendment was not meant to excuse treason and sedition.

Now, keep in mind that the servant of this same sovereign we Americans obey, the sovereign people, is the President. he cannot exceed the authority Constitutionally entrusted to him. Disobedience of unconstitutional laws and regulations is not disobedience of the sovereign.

Between now and January would be a nice time to buy a firearm, before they are outlawed. I am in no way suggesting that such a stockpile is needed for revolt. I mean only that Saint Barbara has a feast day on December 4th, exactly a month hence, and in order to honor the patroness of artillery and gunnery, purchasing a shotgun might be a meritorious act. We do not want to degenerate into England, where shooting a murderer who breaks in your own house is punished.


Saint Barbara, Patroness of Gunnery
I could not find an image of her trampling a Saracen, which is one of her iconic poses. Boy, did I pick the right denomination.

Here is a description of this virgin martyr:
Beautiful maiden imprisoned in a high tower by her father Dioscorus for disobedience. While there she was tutored by philosophers, orators and poets. From them she learned to think, and decided that polytheism was nonsense. With the help of Origen and Valentinian, she converted to Christianity. Her father denounced her to the local authorities for this, and they ordered him to kill her. She escaped, but he caught her, dragged her home by her hair, tortured her, and killed her. He was immediately struck by lightning, or according to some sources, fire from heaven.

Her imprisonment led to her association with towers, then the construction and maintenance of them, then to their military uses. The lightening that avenged her murder led to summoning her protection against fire and lightening, and patronage of firefighters, etc. Her association with things military and with death that falls from the sky led to her patronage of all things related to artillery, and her image graced powder magazines and arsenals for years. While there were undoubtedly beautiful converts named Barbara, this saint is legend.

 

Saint Barbara, your courage is much stronger than the forces of hurricanes and the power of lightening. Be always by our side so that we, like you, may face all storms, wars, trials and tribulations with the same fortitude with which you faced yours. O Beautiful Maiden once imprisoned in a high tower, protect us from the lightning and fire that rages in the sky and the discord of war. Keep us alert and protect us from the dangers that surround us. Holy Mary Mother of Jesus intercessor for us all; we pray to assure receiving of the Sacraments of Penance and Holy Eucharist at the hour of our death. Through Jesus Christ Our Lord, Amen

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

  • 68 comments

[info]princejvstin

November 5 2008, 17:08:03 UTC 3 years ago

Well said, sir.

You know, John, if you and your RFL find time and money, I think the both of you would love the Vatican Splendors exhibit we've got up here at the MHS. Unfortunately this is the third and final stop before they go back into the Vatican's vault.

Perhaps you can tie in a book signing at Uncle Hugo's or Dreamhaven in the process.

[info]johncwright

November 5 2008, 17:12:10 UTC 3 years ago

I don't speak your crazy moon language.

RFL? MHS?

I would like to see the exhibit you mention, though.

[info]ekbell

3 years ago

[info]kokorognosis

November 5 2008, 18:09:17 UTC 3 years ago

I am tempted to say, "Yeah, but I just plain don't trust the guy to even think he has the country's best interests at heart." But he isn't yet using conservatives dipped in tar as torches, I guess.

Pick up the cross, eh...

[info]automatthew

November 5 2008, 21:03:50 UTC 3 years ago

The United States of America (just writing the name makes me feel better) survived Woodrow Wilson. We survived FDR and LBJ and that pitiable, fatherless oaf Bill Clinton. We will survive the attempts at tyranny by the loathsome, covetous, and wicked elements of the Left. I do not think President-elect Obama is one of these enemies, just as Bill Clinton was not.

The danger, as it always has been, is of the frog-boiling sort. The Schumers and the Renos will continue to encroach on our liberties, as is their wont. Buy guns, as the man says.

[info]rlbell

November 5 2008, 19:20:39 UTC 3 years ago

When Ontario elected a radical socialist as premier (protest voting against the major parties got out of hand), leading a radical socialist majority (I meant REALLY out of hand), economic realities reined in the ideological excesses.

Realization of how 'rich' and 'poor' have to be defined so that he can tax the rich to alleviate poverty will prevent things going to far (shame about FOCA).

Seeing as it will happen anyways, and the longer it keeps getting postponed, the worse it will become, it will be a good thing for small government conservatism for the economic meltdown to happen while a democrat inhabits the Whitehouse and democrats control Congress, as they will be hard put to shift the blame.

[info]deansteinlage

November 5 2008, 19:24:17 UTC 3 years ago

St Barbara

I was a Fire Control Tech in the USCG (Uncle Sam's Confused Group) and didn't even know she was my Patroness! Plus my brother-in-law is a firefighter. Now I've got to find a Catholic bookstore in Cedar Rapids...

"The One" won.
And the sun still rises.
And the Red and Blue states are still under the Red, White and Blue.
And we still are bound by our duties to God and country.
And those duties include both vigilance and participation in our government.

So we wait and watch and remember.

[info]isaac_wilcott

November 5 2008, 20:38:38 UTC 3 years ago

Words of wisdom there, Mr. Wright. God was not at all surprised at how this election turned out, and He uses all leaders to His own ends. We may not understand what He is doing, but at least we know He does!

Proverbs 21:1
"The king's heart is in the hand of the LORD, as the rivers of water: he turneth it whithersoever he will."

[info]superversive

November 5 2008, 21:28:26 UTC 3 years ago

Sometimes He uses leaders to chasten the fools who choose to follow them.

Jeremiah 2:26-28:

As the thief is ashamed when he is found, so is the house of Israel ashamed; they, their kings, their princes, and their priests, and their prophets.

Saying to a stock, Thou art my father; and to a stone, Thou hast brought me forth: for they have turned their back unto me, and not their face: but in the time of their trouble they will say, Arise, and save us.

But where are thy gods that thou hast made thee? let them arise, if they can save thee in the time of thy trouble: for according to the number of thy cities are thy gods, O Judah.


God delivered His own chosen people into seventy years of captivity in Babylon; will He then spare America from the wages of its own sins?

[info]m_francis

November 5 2008, 21:29:44 UTC 3 years ago

St. Barbara's Day

The ROTC at LaSalle College in Philadelphia was an artillery detachment under First Army. Every year, the cadet corps would form up on St. Barbara's Day and march down Olney to Broad and then down Broad to the church for the celebration of the Artillerists' Mass.

When I was a sophomore, a notice was put up in the ROTC offices: "First Army is hereby disbanded and its duties will be assumed by Second Army, which will henceforth be known as First Army." There's the right way and the wrong way and the army way.

I don't know if they still do.

[info]juliet_winters

November 5 2008, 21:41:40 UTC 3 years ago

You could always use the seal of Virginia.
Sic semper tyrannis, should it ever come to that on our home soil.

http://www.6hourday.org/seal.html

Apologies for the pot-happy commentary.

[info]axiem

November 5 2008, 23:34:27 UTC 3 years ago

My pastor recently linked to this article on our church forums: http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibrary/TasteAndSee/ByDate/2008/3347_Let_Christians_Vote_As_Though_They_Were_Not_Voting/

It carries much the same sentiment as you have.

As a tangent: I am getting tired of everyone calling this a(n) historic occasion. I would consider every Presidential election a(n) historic occasion, since it means it's taken us that much longer before we destroy ourselves.

Right. Acquiring a firearm. Maybe I might actually look into that.

[info]adamjaskie

November 5 2008, 23:39:31 UTC 3 years ago

Perhaps by that time, the conservatives will have jettisoned the idea of big-government conservatism, and return to the ideals of Goldwater, Reagan, and Burke. Maybe we can take the time to reread the Federalist Papers and re-acquaint ourselves with what are alleged to be our first principles, or perhaps even Adam Smith.


I really, REALLY hope so. The only way the Republicans can hope to gain back more power is to distance themselves from the big-government spend-and-still-cut-taxes faction. Given the choice of tax and spend or don't tax and still spend, I have to apply the Micawber theory (Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen, nineteen, and six, result happiness; annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty, ought and six, result misery.)

[info]randallsquared

November 6 2008, 00:19:03 UTC 3 years ago

"I was fooled by an immoderate anti-Clinton press during Clinton's term, much as the BDS Left was fooled by an immoderate anti-Bush press during Bush's term. Let cooler heads prevail."

Thank you for this. I was also fooled by the immoderate anti-Clinton press, and to some extent I was then fooled by the immoderate anti-Bush press, *too*. :)

[info]robert_mitchell

November 6 2008, 02:00:50 UTC 3 years ago

The mainstream press had a lot to do with Clinton derangement syndrome, and will probably be the cause of Obama derangement syndrome now. The press did not properly "vet" either man, with, I believe, the unspoken understanding that they would embarrass the press once in office. Clinton misread what was going on and thought he was golden, bulletproof. The press was embarrassed when he became reckless, and hit him hard, in, I believe, an attempt to do the vetting they had failed to do during the campaign. People forget how many scandals Clinton had, something on the order of every three months. And Clinton, unwilling to face them head on, stonewalled, and played words games. I think much of the bad press Bush has had to face comes from the press not wanted to get fooled again.
The question is, has Obama learned from Clinton's mistakes? Given his reactions to Joe the plumber and Biden's gaffes, I would say not. But stranger things have happened. There will definitely be true believers going ODS. He can't be all things to all men now, and the press will want to get some of their reputation back. Stay frosty. Never a good idea to stand next to people throwing rocks at armed men.....

[info]robert_mitchell

November 6 2008, 02:03:41 UTC 3 years ago

Not embarrass the press.....(the moving finger writes, and having writ, makes me look more stupid then I hope I am)

[info]vitruvian23

November 6 2008, 18:00:20 UTC 3 years ago

No vetting of Clinton prior to his attaining office? Didn't the whole Gennifer Flowers thing come up during his first campaign? I think it was pretty clear that Slick Willy was a major horndog well before he got elected, and the people chose him anyway. That's probably why he felt he was teflon once in office, but this turned out not to be the case once a legal as opposed to a strictly marital and personal moral issue could be invoked.

Don't forget that the whole Lewinsky thing actually started with the Jones sexual harassment charges, under which rubric he was asked questions about behavior with his staff. Frankly, he probably would have done better to admit to the Lewinsky thing, not only avoiding any grounds for impeachment on perjury, but as going to prove such a pattern of *successful* seductions on his part as to make it ludicrous to think he would drop trow in front of a woman whose reaction he wasn't sure of....

[info]annafirtree

November 6 2008, 02:54:25 UTC 3 years ago

as Sarah Palin becomes the first lady President, and her husband become First Dude.

First Gentleman, First Man, First Husband ... I've gone through the list of possible variations before and all of them sound very lacking to my ears. But all that is over now, because you have hit on the perfect title: First Dude. Can we campaign for that name to stick? :)

[info]bojojoti

November 6 2008, 09:55:12 UTC 3 years ago

Conservatives are generally gracious losers, and, though momentarily disappointed, they rally to do that which is good and right for the whole.

May the gravity of office mold Obama into fine leader of our country.

[info]adt6247

November 6 2008, 12:12:03 UTC 3 years ago

First, our duty as citizens of a democratic republic is to affirm our loyalty to the will of the majority. The losers form rank and file behind the winners in a democracy. Everyone had a chance to vote; but the bargain is that you agree to abide by the outcome, and that agreement is implicit in the act of voting. That is the price you pay for democracy, my fellow sovereign citizens. Anything less erodes the sovereignty of the people.

This is where I fundamentally disagree. I agree that our government is a legitimate one, and that we have to accept that the president is the president, lest we disobey the will of God. However, it is time to question the fundamental propositions and viability of liberal secular democracy.

If a people is virtuous, then democratic forms of government can and do work, but only well on a small scale. We are a people perhaps not without virtue, but one must admit that the virtue seems to diminish with every generation, and has done so at an alarming rate since the dawn of the 20th century. The advent of Freudian psychiatry, inexpensive and reliable contraception and no-fault divorce were certainly the visible catalysts. We are a selfish people, lacking in any backbone, looking to mammon for the solution to our fundamental problems.

Evangelization, prayer, and fasting is the only solution to our current long-term slide into becoming the new Gomorrah. A people without virtue will elect lesser men to govern them. We need to bring the heathens, the heretics, the schismatics, the apostates, the infidels, and the Jews back to Holy Mother Church. We need a demographic shift.

God has a great way of taking something evil, and bringing good out of it. If we do our jobs, and win back those who still haven't fully sold their souls to Moloch and Mammon, we will reforge society. The rest who are left doom themselves with contraception, abortion, and homosexuality. Their blood-lines are forfeit. The children that they rear and form will be few.

[info]necoras

November 6 2008, 20:43:42 UTC 3 years ago

Really? You lump contraception in with abortion and homosexuality? I'd much rather have 2-3 healthy children as opposed to 8 or 10 where all but 2 or 3 die because I can't afford to feed them. Contraception would seem to me to be a far preferable, and far more humane/kind/godly, alternative for population control than starvation/resource depletion.

I suppose you can make some small argument for latex over estrogen based on the statistically small incidence of miscarriage when the pill isn't effective, but that's a different issue.

[info]adt6247

November 6 2008, 21:06:27 UTC 3 years ago

I'm Catholic. Of course I do. Any Catholic who claims otherwise is a heretic.

Abortion is of greater gravity, because a life is lost. Homosexuality is of the same gravity, as is masturbation. They are wrong because they are contradictory to the natural law, and seek to divorce the sexual act from procreation. Although fornication and adultery are also mortal sins, it is of lesser gravity than contraception, homosexuality, and masturbation because they are sins based on context; the sexual act between a man and a woman is not intrinsically disordered, like the other acts are.

Finally, most, if not all, chemical contraceptives are also abortifacients, and thus cause abortions of fertilized embryos.

As far as limiting children to ones means... first, you don't have to live at the level of luxury that most Americans enjoy. One does not necessarily need cable TV, a cell phone, 2 cars, internet access. If you have more kids, learn to do without and live cheaper. If one is not able to afford more children, one could practice Natural Family Planning, and trust that in the event that it fails, God will provide for you. This should only, of course, be used in grave circumstances. In extremely grave circumstances, one could simply abstain from sex with one's spouse. Not ideal, certainly, but far, far better than divorcing the procreative from unitive aspects of sex by decreasing the fecundity of the act, and thus separating the self from sanctifying grace and risking eternal damnation.

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]m_francis

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

November 6 2008, 21:08:46 UTC 3 years ago

Also, my point was that less Godly people are having fewer children, because they welcome contraception, abortion, and homosexuality -- all of which frustrate child bearing. Faithful Catholics and, alas, Mormons and Mohammedans, are reproducing at a far greater rate than, well, anyone else.

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]m_francis

3 years ago

[info]johncwright

November 6 2008, 21:55:20 UTC 3 years ago

"Really? You lump contraception in with abortion and homosexuality?"

I also. The reason why I became Catholic is that they were the only Christian denomination to agree with me that contraception is a grave moral error. As recently as 1930, all Christian denominations, indeed, all the civilized world, agreed with this.

Your argument about having fewer children so as to be able to feed them is comical when we live in a country where underpopulation is a major worry and obesity is the leading cause of death.

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]adt6247

3 years ago

[info]m_francis

3 years ago

[info]necoras

3 years ago

[info]m_francis

3 years ago

[info]necoras

November 6 2008, 20:30:49 UTC 3 years ago

I really don't think that guns will be outlawed on January 21st. I can see purchasing a weapon if/when the legislation starts moving and before a bill is signed. I do hold hope in the recent decision against the DC Ban.

Personally I'm holding out for a pistol/rifle size version of the Active Denial System (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_denial_system). I have nothing against owning guns, far from it, but as a personal choice I'd prefer less than lethal force.

[info]misterdasher

November 9 2008, 19:26:10 UTC 3 years ago

Tyndale's revision

As far as I know, there was no revised version of the Bible printed up during the Enlightenment that left out the inconvenient passage after the fashion of Luther scuttling the inconvenient the Book of the Maccabees.

IIRC, Tyndale was put to death for excluding from his translation of the Scriptures the very passage you cite from Romans, among a couple other excisions. He also translated episcopos and episcopoi as overseer and overseers, respectively, rather than using the customary "bishop" and "bishops" as was common among the various English translations then extant.

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…